Sunday, May 10, 2015

Man or Woman?: Fear of Femininity and Gender Ambiguity in Comedy

     The film Dostana depicts two male friends, Sam and Kunal, who pretend to be gay so they can live in a girls-only apartment, and end up faking the relationship for a significant period of time. Despite their determination to maintain their friendship with their beautiful housemate, Neha, both fall in love her and fail to keep these feelings secret.  As I was watching the film, I was struck by film’s presentation of masculinity, especially in a homosexual context. The comical representation of Sam’s and Kunal’s masculinity demonstrate society’s fear of  femininity and sexual ambiguity.
   Fear of the feminine emerges early in the film. When Sameer works as a nurse, one of his patients asks why he did not become a doctor. A running joke in the film is that when Sameer shares that his occupation is a nurse, someone will ask if he wears a short skirt. Sam expresses annoyance about the jibes he receives from working in a female-typed occupation which seems to detract from his manliness.
     Furthermore, men seem to fear the feminine presence in a man because too much femininity ultimately causes gender ambiguity. When Sameer’s mother finds out that her son has filed for a passport application as a member of a gay couple, she rushes to the trio’s apartment to admonish her son.  According to Sameer’s mother, the trouble is not that her son is attracted to men, but that he cannot distinguish between men and women.  Thus, she posits that being a gay relationship is simply the result of being unable to discern another’s gender, which can only occur if a man is less masculine.
        The film portrays M as a stereotypical gay and effeminate man to criticize the representing the gay man a less masculine one. M is a fashion magazine executive, so he is very interested in the subtleties of clothing and appearance. As a completely comical character, he kind of makes a farce of the feminine.  Although M is a man, his exaggerated female mannerisms and interests beckon the audience to view him as more female than male.  In light of the film’s fear of the feminine, M’s portrayal seems to explain why society expresses intolerance for gays.
    Another instance in which the movie points out the ludicrousness of gay stereotypes occurs at the event Abhimanyu, Neha, Sam, and Kunal attend. Sam and Kunal had been fighting because they discovered that both have feelings for Neha. To avoid sharing that this was the source of the conflict, Sam pretends that he is hurt about Kunal’s infidelity. To express his anguish, Sam exaggerates a tearful countenance  which prompts Neha to give him a hug. This moment is actually quite comical, and there is often truth in humor, so this functions as another critique of prejudice against gays.  
      Furthermore, these instances of exaggerated “gayness” occur only sporadically in the film. Neha’s reception of their behavior can be interpreted as the kind of acceptance and tolerance the film aims to promote.Since Sam and Kunal are actually heterosexual, and a significant portion of the movie focuses on their attraction to Neha, these instances highlights the contrast in expected behavior of straight and gay males. Although Neha seems obtuse since she fails to recognize that they have feelings for her, one can also interpret her lack of perspicacity as an avoidance of labeling behavior as gay or straight. Because Sam and Kunal said they were gay, she believes that this is what defines their sexuality, and so she does not attempt to gauge how they perform their sexual identities through clothing, mannerisms, etc.
    In summary, I argued that Dostana criticizes society’s fear of the feminine and gender ambiguity through its comical portrayals of gay men. The film establishes this critique by depicting the jibes that Sam receives by working in a conventionally female field and by showing that Sam’s mother attributes his preference for a men as a result of not being able to discern men from women The film explores these ideas through comically representing gay men, such as M, as extremely effeminate who essentially fail in being masculine or feminine. Neha’s acceptance of their sexual identity, regardless of their relative masculinity, provides a glimmer of hope for a more accepting society.






No comments:

Post a Comment